Skip to main content

Appeals Court Upholds Medicaid Funding Cut For Planned Parenthood

A federal appeals court ruled Friday that a provision of President Donald Trump’s signature tax and domestic policy law cutting Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood entities that perform abortions does not constitute unconstitutional punishment.

The Boston based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a preliminary injunction issued in July by U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani, who had found the law likely violated the Constitution by targeting Planned Parenthood health centers, Reuters reported.

The appeals court allowed the provision to take effect in September while it reviewed the Trump administration’s appeal of Talwani’s ruling.

Planned Parenthood has said at least 20 health centers have closed since Trump signed the measure into law in July.

Talwani has since blocked enforcement of the law in a separate case brought by 22 Democratic led states and the District of Columbia, though the appeals court temporarily stayed that ruling while it considers whether to lift the injunction.

Alexis McGill Johnson, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said Friday’s decision allows the administration to restrict access to care.

“This ruling enables the Trump administration’s attempts to block access to care for patients most in need and force Planned Parenthood health centers to the financial brink,” Johnson said in a statement.

The dispute centers on a provision of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, passed by the Republican led Congress, that bars Medicaid funding for nonprofit organizations that provide family planning services if they perform abortions and received more than $800,000 in Medicaid funds during the 2023 fiscal year.

In July, Talwani ruled that the provision amounted to a bill of attainder designed to punish Planned Parenthood for providing abortion services.

A bill of attainder is a legislative act prohibited by the Constitution that imposes punishment on a person or group without a judicial trial.

U.S. Circuit Judge Gustavo Gelpi, writing for a three judge panel appointed by former President Joe Biden, rejected that conclusion.

“The law simply does not impose ‘punishment’ as the term has been historically understood,” Gelpi wrote.

“It instead uses Congress’ taxing and spending power to put appellees to a difficult choice: give up federal Medicaid funds and continue to provide abortion services or continue receiving such funds by abandoning the provision of abortion services,” he added.

The Trump administration argued on appeal that Congress acted lawfully in restricting Medicaid funding for abortion providers following the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision overturning the nationwide right to abortion.

Talwani had also ruled that the law burdened the First Amendment rights of some Planned Parenthood affiliates that do not provide abortions by limiting their ability to associate with the broader organization.

The appeals court overturned that holding as well, narrowly interpreting the law to apply only to affiliates operating under common corporate control with organizations that perform abortions.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

JUST IN 🚨🚨: "'Supreme Court Delivers 8-1 Ruling Trump's Justices Come Through Big Time!!!!""

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to reinstate a federal anti-money laundering statute at the request of the federal government, allowing the law to remain in effect while an ongoing legal challenge continues in a lower court. The justices issued an emergency stay that temporarily reverses a lower court’s injunction blocking enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the lone dissenter in the decision. The Biden administration’s Justice Department filed an emergency appeal late last month, urging the high court to intervene after a federal district judge ruled that the CTA was unconstitutional and halted its implementation nationwide. Just three days after President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the Supreme Court granted the government’s request, enabling federal officials to move forward with enforcing the law as litigation proceeds. Although the Justice Department’s application remained pending through the presidential transition, the Trump...
Post a Comment
Read more

Supreme Court Delivers 8-1 Ruling Trump's Justices Come Through Big Time!!!!

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to reinstate a federal anti-money laundering statute at the request of the federal government, allowing the law to remain in effect while an ongoing legal challenge continues in a lower court. The justices issued an emergency stay that temporarily reverses a lower court’s injunction blocking enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the lone dissenter in the decision. The Biden administration’s Justice Department filed an emergency appeal late last month, urging the high court to intervene after a federal district judge ruled that the CTA was unconstitutional and halted its implementation nationwide. Just three days after President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the Supreme Court granted the government’s request, enabling federal officials to move forward with enforcing the law as litigation proceeds. Although the Justice Department’s application remained pending through the presidential transition, the Trump ...
Post a Comment
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court Approves Reinstating Federal Anti–Money Laundering Measure

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to reinstate a federal anti-money laundering statute at the request of the federal government, allowing the law to remain in effect while an ongoing legal challenge continues in a lower court. The justices issued an emergency stay that temporarily reverses a lower court’s injunction blocking enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the lone dissenter in the decision. The Biden administration’s Justice Department filed an emergency appeal late last month, urging the high court to intervene after a federal district judge ruled that the CTA was unconstitutional and halted its implementation nationwide. Just three days after President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the Supreme Court granted the government’s request, enabling federal officials to move forward with enforcing the law as litigation proceeds. Although the Justice Department’s application remained pending through the presidential transition, the Trump ...
Post a Comment
Read more